| Experimental evidence of kinesiological test
© di Renato
Burri
Holistic doctors regard kinesiology as a diagnostic
method largely profitable in detecting food intolerance.
Philosophically it relies on the psycho-physical
relationship that man establishes with his environment.
As a principle the kinesiological test reveals a direct
link between the muscle-tone and a stressing factor. We
define a stressing factor any substance that results noxious,
intolerant or allergenic to the patient’s organism.
Kinesiology assumes that the simple presence of a stressing
factor causes to the patient a loss of muscle-tone that the
doctor can detect through a suitable test. The most
widespread technique is the O-ring test. It consists in
checking the strength of the O-shaped grip the patient does
by firmly pressing against each other the tips of his right
hand thumb and index. In a preliminary phase the therapist
checks the patient’s strength by opening his O-ring grip
in normal conditions, i.e. when stressing factors are absent.
After this procedure that is a sort of calibration, the
therapist asks the patient to hold in his left hand, one at
a time, several glass vials while he checks the O-ring grip
strength. Each vial contains a different substance and some
of them may seem to loosen clearly the O-ring grip strength.
When this is the case, the therapist concludes that the
substance contained in that specific vial acts as a
stressing factor on the patient’s organism.
Holistic doctors have been using this diagnostic method
since many years now and through that time it has gained an
increasing acceptance. Nevertheless under these premises the
test interpretation appears fairly subjective so that many
detractors claim the method is diagnostically unreliable and
scientifically unacceptable. Our research team has investigated this method in search, if
possible, of its objective basis. As a first step we found and experimentally inspected the
test subjectivity causes that depend on the therapist:
-
1) The patient's acquaintance can influence the
therapist so that during the test he may apply a
stronger or weaker strength according to some
preconceived beliefs.
-
2) The therapist's organism may undergo during the
test the same influences than the patient; in other
words he could be sensible to some substances in the
same extent than the patient.
-
3) The patient may be too strong or too weak in the
therapist's regards, so that the test may become hard or
even impossible to perform.
There are also some subjectivity causes that depend on
the patient, such as,
-
1) random factors, as for instance a momentary
distraction, fatigue, or emotional agent.
-
2) the patient may be influenced by the therapist.
We thought that by performing the O-ring grip test in a
mechanical way we could get rid of these problems, so we
planned and built a mechanism
-
1) to experimentally verify the loss of muscle-tone
due to stressing factors, and,
-
2) to give an objective interpretation of the
phenomenon.
In this case the results reliability depends on the
solution of the instrumental interference problems
Preliminary investigations confirmed the findings of the
therapist skilled in this technique, i.e. that the presence
of any electromagnetic field, as the one generated by the
accumulators of a portable phone, or even by a watch battery,
is enough to invalidate the test.
The device we built was designed to meet three basic
requirements:
-
1) to elude any possible electromagnetic test
pollution: we reached the scope by adapting to our needs
the robot grippers technology since these mechanisms use
air or oil pressure as the driving force;
-
2) to make the therapist's interpretation objective:
we reached the scope by planning our instrument so that
the force the mechanism exerts is calibrated and
constant throughout the test. 3) to continuously control the pressure the patient
is applying.
Operating system The operator through the instrument performs two operations:-
he measures the patient's muscle tone through his O-ring
grip strength in normal conditions i.e. -
The first device we built was operated by the air
pressure flowing into a simple double compensating cylinder.
This device, that we called COOPTA to mean a
three-play action, allowed us to evaluate the range of the
forces in play: the O-ring grip strength and its changes due
to stressing factors. In our experimental practice we
noticed that during the test the patient sometimes changes
the force he is exerting on the instrument only because of
subjective reasons such as a momentary distraction. This
event of course invalidates the test.
Thus we built a second device (named COOPTA2)
that allowed us to monitor the force the patient exerts
during the test. The experiments we conducted with this
device on a large number of patients pointed out the
importance the time variable plays while he undergoes the
O-ring test. The force variation caused by a stressing
factor depends on how long the patient has to exert that
force. Therefore we had to take into account not only the
opening distance between the two levers of the instrument,
but also the time during which they stay open. The power
involved in the opening of the levers when the patient is
exerting a force F is thus P=Fst,
where s represents the distance between the levers in the
open position and t is the time it takes the levers to open.
Since we can assume P=const and s=const
we conclude that if we increase the test time a smaller
force will be required. Thus we can determine the time
variable in quite a large range of values, so that an
increase or decrease of one second can help in evaluating
weak forces more precisely.
To satisfy this new requirement we built a third
instrument, that we called COOPTA 1000, and that is
much more complex and sensible than the previous ones.
This mechanism does not only perform a dynamometric
measure, but also an electronic operational data processing.
The system operates through pressure gauges to avoid any
electromagnetic test pollution. The electronic data
processing operates through thin air channels at a safety
distance of about 3 metres. Nevertheless this sophisticated machine did not solve all
possible problems, since checking a quite large number of
patients we found that the test is contradictory in an
average of about forty per cent cases. This means that the
instrumental response points out as not being a stressing
factor a certain substance that results to be a stressing
factor six times out of ten. To better understand what was
going on we had to set up a test method. Investigations over almost hundred patients indicated
some standard requirements in performing the O-ring test:
-
- during the test the patient should look in
a fixed direction;
-
- the vial containing the substance to check should
be kept at the breastbone level,
-
- the patient should hold the vial for at least
ten seconds before performing the test.
Our experimental investigation suggested a couple
of important conclusions.
-
The most significant one is that experiments
documented the belief that some substances, although
contained in a sealed clear glass vial, really
cause a weakening of O-ring grip strength.
-
On the other side the comparison between blind tests
performed by the COOPTA instrument and several
therapists using the traditional system showed no
agreement both between Coopta results and therapists
results and among therapists themselves.
Obviously the mechanical way of performing the
kinesiological test requires a longer time than that
required for the manual test, but on the other side the
results are definitely more reliable.
Once we ascertained the objective existence of stressing
factors and their weakening action, we will aim our next efforts on one side
toward the understanding of which biophysical instrument allows the organism to
recognise the stressing factors, and on the other toward the intimate nature of
these external forces that are able to interact with the organism itself.
INVIA QUESTA NOTIZIA AD UN AMICO 
|